Saturday, August 24, 2013
Saturday, July 6, 2013
Thursday, July 4, 2013
Patriots and Perfection
I have never been one to go all out for the 4th
of July. Perhaps it was my childhood fear of fireworks that, let’s be frank,
continues to this day. Perhaps it was that my family never placed much of an
emphasis on this day, and it fell in with the rest of the summer cookouts that,
while pleasant, failed to register as significant. Or perhaps it is that I have
never felt extraordinarily patriotic. I am not one to accessorize with American
flags or plaster my car with red, white, and blue bumper stickers, and that has
always made me feel like less of an American than those who wear their
admiration of America quite literally on their sleeve (or lapel, for the
politicians among us).
This thought has been with me lately: what is patriotism? I
have found it difficult to call myself a patriot because I don’t think this is
the greatest nation on earth. My appreciation for this country has always been
tempered by the realization that there are other wonderful places on this
earth, and that we still have many problems to resolve. I don’t fit in with the
group that have staked their claim on the title “patriot”. But just because I’m
not wearing rose-colored glasses doesn’t mean I don’t love this country. My
love is just more complex and subtle. Like all relationships, it has its ups
and its downs, but there is something deep and abiding that keeps me loyal.
Sunday, May 26, 2013
Photography: Short North Columbus
Everybody Knows Somebody
Everybody knows somebody.
The National Eating Disorders Association’s Awareness Week began on Sunday,
and while I intended to have this post ready to ring in the week, I
found it to be enormously difficult to write. In fact, it almost ended
in the trash can quite a few times, little more than a virtual memory.
But in the end, I can’t remain quiet about this subject.
Statistics on clinical eating disorders are already stark –
they have among the highest death rates of any psychiatric condition,
and are among the most commonly-diagnosed mental health conditions in
young women. Equally disturbing is the rise of something known as the Eating Disorder Not Otherwise Specified.
The EDNOS often appears as a combination of symptoms, so it doesn’t
fall easily into the categories of anorexia, bulimia, and binge eating
disorder, but it is no less serious. And recent evidence indicates that
the numbers are much higher than we might expect.
NEDA’s theme for this year’s awareness week is
“everybody knows somebody.” I certainly know a few. Depending on how you
define “eating disorder,” I may even be one of those somebodies.
In 2008, Self Magazine published a study they
conducted in coordination with the University of North Carolina at
Chapel Hill. The study drew from over four thousand women, and the
results are startling: three quarters of American women report
disordered eating behaviors. Sixty five percent fall into the
“disordered eating” category, while ten percent display behaviors
consistent with anorexia, bulimia nervosa, or binge eating disorder.
Let that sink in for a minute. Three out of four women in America have unhealthy relationships with food and their own body.
So you probably don’t just know somebody. You know quite a few. You may also be one, like me.
I was in the grocery store the other day, and I
made a rare trip down an aisle I don’t often traverse. I avoid that
aisle – in its shadows lurk empty calories and late-night body image
anxieties. I had been wanting something from this snack aisle, but every
glossy bag held an invisible threat that stopped me in my tracks. If
only it had been as easy as reaching for the thing that sounded best,
paying at the register, and going home to enjoy a snack.
Instead, I read every label, compared calorie and
fat content. I thought about whether I would be able to eat only the
designated portion, or if I risked snacking on more. I analyzed every
piece of information weighed the pros and cons, calculated the calories I
had burned that day, until any joy I would have gotten from that morsel
had been wrung out of the experience. I finally decided
on a specific brand of popcorn whose nutritional content (or rather,
lack of caloric content), was marginally better than the rest, brought
it home, measured out the proper amount, and ate it. It was stale and
deeply unsatisfying.
That moment of paralysis in the store struck me. It
is what motivated me to sit down and finally put these words to paper,
because I could not remain silent. It was the middle of NEDA Awareness
week, and there I was frozen in the snack aisle, letting a bag of
popcorn dictate my evening.
Self’s study confirmed what years of
observation have taught me: that I am not alone. This is the average
woman’s experience. I know this from my own life, from the stories my
friends have told me, from the dialogue written into books and movies,
from the magazine articles about emotional eating and how to diet
without suffering. Food is no longer something to nourish our bodies,
and to enjoy. It is an enemy, a taskmaster, a
dysfunctional relationship. We want it to bring us joy, but we can’t
seem to shake the guilt that latches on to us.
There’s no doubt that America has a problem with
food. Our obesity rates have risen steadily over the last few decades,
and the fast food and dieting industries have both exploded. Our
waistlines are expanding as the food industries’ wallets grow thick and
we wage inner war with ourselves. When the standard of beauty is six
feet tall and weighs 120 pounds, how can anyone hope to measure up?
Sure, I’m a healthy weight, but if I’d just not eaten that dessert, I could look like Keira Knightley, right?
53 percent of dieters are already a healthy weight. More than half of the people trying to shed some pounds have absolutely no reason they should do so. And I am one of them.
Unhealthy body image hurts everyone. When we feel
shame about our bodies, we close ourselves off to life. When we are
thinking about calories and grams of fat and whether that lack of
smoothness around our hips is just water weight or evidence that we
should step up our treadmill time, we are not thinking about our loved
ones, our achievements, our hopes, and our dreams. But
these thoughts are pervasive. Even when we want to escape them, they
chase us down. Billboards, magazine ads, television spots, web banners
all promote the ideal. Photoshopping is ubiquitous, and yet we are prone
to believe that what we see is real. Achievable. Necessary.
On Self’s website, next to the article about the prevalence of disordered eating, was a link to join the “Self diet club.” I don’t know about you, but that unsettles me.
This is not a problem restricted to a small few who
can be labeled “mentally unwell” and put aside and ignored. This is a
widespread issue, and it is only worsening. About
half of children between six and twelve are concerned about their
weight, and eighty percent of ten year olds have been on a diet. If
we don’t respect our own bodies, how can we ask our children to? How
can we ask our friends to be kind to themselves if we can’t say nice
things about our own bodies?
Disordered eating is on the rise. It has become the
new normal. But it doesn’t have to stay that way. Do what you can to
change the conversation in our media. Challenge ads that objectify women
or that promote an unrealistic or unreachable ideal. And don’t forget
that men suffer from these same standards. Ten to fifteen percent of eating disorder patients are male.
Learn about different body types, and remember that beauty is in the
eye of the beholder. And even on the worst days, appreciate your body
for what it does for you every day.
Mine can carry me across the finish line of a half
marathon. It can dance when my favorite song comes on. It can offer an
embrace to those I love. It allows me to feel a wide range of emotions,
not just cerebrally, but in every nerve and every muscle. It is my
window to the world, and your body is the same for you. It is not to be
punished or reformed, but to be loved, respected, and cared for.
I can’t always remember to do those things. But
every day that I do is a small victory. And every person who is working
to change their inner dialogue and our global conversations about beauty
and self esteem is lifting the cloud cover just a little bit more.
Because life is so much more than what we see in
magazine ads. Happiness is not a size zero body; it is learning to love
the world – and yourself – for the natural beauty. And yes, even flaws
are worthy of love.
Thursday, November 8, 2012
National Novel Writing Month
It’s early November. Halloween is only just over and the
Christmas decorations are already making their appearance in local
stores. But for many, the frenzied holiday shopping will have to wait
another month: all their free time in November has already been claimed.
If the roads seem quieter, it may not be your imagination. If the
coffee shops and libraries seem more crowded, they probably are. Take a
look at these newcomers (or the occasional regular who seems more
settled in to their usual booth than normal.) They are part of a larger
group, a silent and industrious movement that happens once a year.
Some sit in the corners of busy coffee shops, hidden away with their laptops and take-out cups filled with coffee. They jump a little and glance up as customers nearby laugh loudly, but only moments later, they’re deeply absorbed again. Their fingers tap on the keyboard, creating a din that’s nearly audible over the voices and the sounds of espresso machines and milk frothers. Or they perch on a chair in the solitude of their homes, their laptops balanced on their knees as they build up a momentum of written word.
These people are WriMos (or NaNos, if you prefer.) They are participating in National Novel Writing Month (or NaNoWriMo), an annual event that involves writers from all over the world. Between 12:00:00 on November 1 and 11:59:59 on November 30, the participants scramble to write a 50,000-word novel. Tens of thousands of participants (over 256,600 signed up in 2011 and 36,843 finished their novels) write works the length of The Great Gatsby or Catcher in the Rye. Some write even longer novels, by some miracle of time management. This year, I will be one of them. After a three year absence, I have decided to recommit my Novembers to the somewhat absurd, often infuriating, and always rewarding pursuit of writing a novel in 30 days on top of an already demanding course load, work schedule, and generally busy life.
Read more.
Some sit in the corners of busy coffee shops, hidden away with their laptops and take-out cups filled with coffee. They jump a little and glance up as customers nearby laugh loudly, but only moments later, they’re deeply absorbed again. Their fingers tap on the keyboard, creating a din that’s nearly audible over the voices and the sounds of espresso machines and milk frothers. Or they perch on a chair in the solitude of their homes, their laptops balanced on their knees as they build up a momentum of written word.
These people are WriMos (or NaNos, if you prefer.) They are participating in National Novel Writing Month (or NaNoWriMo), an annual event that involves writers from all over the world. Between 12:00:00 on November 1 and 11:59:59 on November 30, the participants scramble to write a 50,000-word novel. Tens of thousands of participants (over 256,600 signed up in 2011 and 36,843 finished their novels) write works the length of The Great Gatsby or Catcher in the Rye. Some write even longer novels, by some miracle of time management. This year, I will be one of them. After a three year absence, I have decided to recommit my Novembers to the somewhat absurd, often infuriating, and always rewarding pursuit of writing a novel in 30 days on top of an already demanding course load, work schedule, and generally busy life.
Read more.
Wednesday, October 24, 2012
Photography: "Autumn Bliss"
Last weekend, I went to the Circleville Pumpkin Festival, to see the giant pumpkins and get some photographs.
The day after, I went to my old high school and took a walk on the cross country trail to get some photos of the beautiful fall colors before they fade into winter:
Can you see why this is my favorite season? :)
Tuesday, October 23, 2012
Sex, Pistols
About a month ago, a new PC game showed up on Steam, as part of their
Greenlight program that allows customers to vote on the next games to be offered on the site. The same day, Steam took it down, later citing inappropriate content.
On the game’s page, Steam left a message saying that: “the item has
been banned for either violating the Steam Terms of Service or the Terms
of Service for Greenlight.” It must have had some pretty questionable
contact to be removed from a server that also sells Grand Theft Auto.
Before I get into the details of this particular game, I want to point out some of the most popular games that have been sold through Steam or comparable services: Left 4 Dead, Doom 3, multiple iterations of the Call of Duty series, and most infamously, Grand Theft Auto IV. Most of these are well-known, even outside the gaming world, but it doesn’t take a lot of scrutiny to figure out that they are structured around violence: most of them include references to war, death, and violence in their titles. Now, to be fair, some of the “greatest hits” in the gaming world are games like Portal and Minecraft, which involve no violence and focus instead on puzzles, creativity, world building, and other engaging and positive activities. The gaming industry, like the film industry, has a rating system intended to keep young children from games with inappropriate content, so violent games are rated M, for 17 and older, but that doesn’t stop many “underage” teens from playing these bloody and brutal games.
So what was the incredibly offensive content that caused a terms of service violation and got this game removed from Steam’s Greenlight page? It must be worse than the mechanism in Grand Theft Auto – or GTA – in which you can have sex with prostitutes and then kill them. This behavior is not only possible, but is encouraged by the gameplay mechanics, because having sex with a prostitute raises your health. The drawback, according to the wikia page for GTA, is that it costs money – a problem easily remedied by killing the hooker and taking her money. The sex acts, while not shown in great detail, are also not skipped over (NSFW). This is not objectionable to Steam.
And it definitely must be worse than the scoring system in Manhunt, which encourages you to carry out grisly and sadistic murders. In that game, your score is dependent on how gruesome the executions are (Disturbing images abound), and you are rated from a low “unimpressive” to a high “extremely competent.”
In fact, it is an erotic game called Seduce Me, which focuses on building relationships – yes, sexual ones – with characters in the game. The sex appears to be all consensual, and from what little I have seen of it (the game has yet to come out, but the developer has gameplay clips up as a preview), your actions in the game have consequences. So while I can’t make pronouncements about the detail of its content, I can say that from what the developer released, it seems rather, well, harmless.
Read more.
Before I get into the details of this particular game, I want to point out some of the most popular games that have been sold through Steam or comparable services: Left 4 Dead, Doom 3, multiple iterations of the Call of Duty series, and most infamously, Grand Theft Auto IV. Most of these are well-known, even outside the gaming world, but it doesn’t take a lot of scrutiny to figure out that they are structured around violence: most of them include references to war, death, and violence in their titles. Now, to be fair, some of the “greatest hits” in the gaming world are games like Portal and Minecraft, which involve no violence and focus instead on puzzles, creativity, world building, and other engaging and positive activities. The gaming industry, like the film industry, has a rating system intended to keep young children from games with inappropriate content, so violent games are rated M, for 17 and older, but that doesn’t stop many “underage” teens from playing these bloody and brutal games.
So what was the incredibly offensive content that caused a terms of service violation and got this game removed from Steam’s Greenlight page? It must be worse than the mechanism in Grand Theft Auto – or GTA – in which you can have sex with prostitutes and then kill them. This behavior is not only possible, but is encouraged by the gameplay mechanics, because having sex with a prostitute raises your health. The drawback, according to the wikia page for GTA, is that it costs money – a problem easily remedied by killing the hooker and taking her money. The sex acts, while not shown in great detail, are also not skipped over (NSFW). This is not objectionable to Steam.
And it definitely must be worse than the scoring system in Manhunt, which encourages you to carry out grisly and sadistic murders. In that game, your score is dependent on how gruesome the executions are (Disturbing images abound), and you are rated from a low “unimpressive” to a high “extremely competent.”
In fact, it is an erotic game called Seduce Me, which focuses on building relationships – yes, sexual ones – with characters in the game. The sex appears to be all consensual, and from what little I have seen of it (the game has yet to come out, but the developer has gameplay clips up as a preview), your actions in the game have consequences. So while I can’t make pronouncements about the detail of its content, I can say that from what the developer released, it seems rather, well, harmless.
Read more.
Tuesday, October 9, 2012
Choice for the Choiceless
It’s that time again. Political ads frame segments of your favorite
television show. Signs pop up in yards, inspiring rage or camaraderie.
Bumper stickers become ubiquitous. I have only been eligible to vote in
one election in my short life and have only been tuned in to three, but
already I’m growing battle-weary. And I sense this same fatigue among
many of my generation. We often hear that the youth vote is in the tank
for Obama. But what we don’t hear a lot is that the youth vote isn’t as
excited as it was four years ago. In fact, a Gallup poll this summer
reported that only 58 percent of the 18-29 demographic plans to vote this year.
This is our future that is being debated. This is our country, our leaders, our government. And yet, there is a sense of helplessness.
I watched two debates this week: the first presidential debate and “The Rumble 2012.” The presidential debate was first, and within five minutes I was already yelling at the screen and fiercely regretting my decision. And I was not just shouting at Romney (full disclosure, I’m one of those youth voters who will be ticking the box for Obama this year, though my reasoning behind that is more complicated than one might expect which we’ll get to later). I was shouting and shaking my fist because both candidates were up there delivering false or exaggerated sound bites rather than honestly addressing the real problems that are facing our country. Romney was proclaimed the winner, and fact checkers everywhere revealed the gross exaggerations and blatant lies that won him the debate. They also revealed a smaller though not insubstantial number of lies and gross exaggerations from Obama.
”The Rumble” was an online, live-streamed debate between Jon Stewart of The Daily Show and Bill O’Reilly of The O’Reilly Factor. Although it was less formal than the presidential debates, and largely intended for entertainment rather than substance, it brought up a number of interesting and complex issues. What intrigued me the most were the audience questions that were read in the final segment of the debate. Many of these questions addressed the issue of trust. Why should we vote for Obama over Romney? Or Romney over Obama? How can we trust either presidential candidate? They both lie. They are both vying for the job of commander in chief of the largest military in the world, leader of arguably the only remaining superpower, the position called “most powerful man in the world,” and “leader of the free world.” High stakes lead to high risks. How can we believe that either candidate or either party can be trusted with our future?
Read more.
This is our future that is being debated. This is our country, our leaders, our government. And yet, there is a sense of helplessness.
I watched two debates this week: the first presidential debate and “The Rumble 2012.” The presidential debate was first, and within five minutes I was already yelling at the screen and fiercely regretting my decision. And I was not just shouting at Romney (full disclosure, I’m one of those youth voters who will be ticking the box for Obama this year, though my reasoning behind that is more complicated than one might expect which we’ll get to later). I was shouting and shaking my fist because both candidates were up there delivering false or exaggerated sound bites rather than honestly addressing the real problems that are facing our country. Romney was proclaimed the winner, and fact checkers everywhere revealed the gross exaggerations and blatant lies that won him the debate. They also revealed a smaller though not insubstantial number of lies and gross exaggerations from Obama.
”The Rumble” was an online, live-streamed debate between Jon Stewart of The Daily Show and Bill O’Reilly of The O’Reilly Factor. Although it was less formal than the presidential debates, and largely intended for entertainment rather than substance, it brought up a number of interesting and complex issues. What intrigued me the most were the audience questions that were read in the final segment of the debate. Many of these questions addressed the issue of trust. Why should we vote for Obama over Romney? Or Romney over Obama? How can we trust either presidential candidate? They both lie. They are both vying for the job of commander in chief of the largest military in the world, leader of arguably the only remaining superpower, the position called “most powerful man in the world,” and “leader of the free world.” High stakes lead to high risks. How can we believe that either candidate or either party can be trusted with our future?
Read more.
Labels:
barack obama,
bill o'reilly,
debate,
democrat,
education,
election,
jill stein,
jon stewart,
mitt romney,
obama,
politics,
republican,
romney,
the green party,
the rumble 2012,
voting,
voting rights,
youth
Friday, October 5, 2012
Photography: "Fallen"
"Fallen."
El fuente del angel caÃdo in Parque Retiro in Madrid. Available for purchase on FineArt America.
Sunday, September 30, 2012
Wednesday, September 19, 2012
Tuesday, September 18, 2012
As the Singularity Approaches
Science lately is blurring the line between biology and technology.
Harvard has made two startlingly large advances recently: they managed
to use DNA to store 700 terabytes of data, and they have created synthetic (read: cyborg) flesh.
DNA is essentially the original computer code: it stores complex
information in different arrangements of four different molecules,
called A, G, C, and T for simplicity. Scientists assigned zeroes and
ones to these letters to simulate binary code, the language on which
computers run. Using this makeshift binary code, they were able to store
700 terabytes in just one gram of DNA (for comparison, the first 4
terabyte hard drive for computers was just manufactured in 2011, and the
average MacBook Pro has less than one terabyte of hard drive space).
Along with this new DNA-as-disk-drive ability, Harvard also melded electronics with living cells to create honest-to-God cyborg flesh. The human body reacts to electrical impulses fired by the brain, something loosely replicated by these part-biological, part-technological tissue cultures. While the half-organic tissue can’t yet react to the electrical impulses, the technology allows for close monitoring of the tissue. The short term implications are earlier warning for medical conditions caused by inflammation, monitoring pre-cancerous cells, or even tracking drug absorption and measuring the effectiveness of medications. The long-term implications are on a much grander scale.
Read more.
Along with this new DNA-as-disk-drive ability, Harvard also melded electronics with living cells to create honest-to-God cyborg flesh. The human body reacts to electrical impulses fired by the brain, something loosely replicated by these part-biological, part-technological tissue cultures. While the half-organic tissue can’t yet react to the electrical impulses, the technology allows for close monitoring of the tissue. The short term implications are earlier warning for medical conditions caused by inflammation, monitoring pre-cancerous cells, or even tracking drug absorption and measuring the effectiveness of medications. The long-term implications are on a much grander scale.
Read more.
Tuesday, September 11, 2012
How We Remember
They say the 9-11 attacks of 2001 were our generation’s Pearl Harbor
or Kennedy assassination. It seems that everyone over 18 has a story
about where they were that day, when their world changed so abruptly. I
was in eight grade, and I remember teachers interrupting my science
class to whisper to each other. It wasn’t until third period history,
at 9:45, after the planes had hit, that they told us what happened. We
watched the news all through class that morning, and we saw the towers
fall. It was the first time I’d ever heard the name “Osama bin Laden.”
It’s hard to believe, now, that there was a time before bin Laden, and
before the War on Terror.
Thursday, September 6, 2012
Wednesday, September 5, 2012
A Man Beyond
The great state of Ohio has produced 25 NASA astronauts. Or, as I heard it phrased for most of my childhood: “what is it about this state that makes people want to flee the Earth?” Every day, I pass the John Glenn School of Public Affairs on my way to class at Ohio State University. Glenn, the first American to orbit the Earth and an Ohio native, went on to become a memorable senator and public leader. It is a reminder that Ohio is not only home to a large number of astronauts, but to some of the best-known. One of the greatest of these Ohio astronauts, Neil Armstrong, passed away at the end of August. But unlike Glenn, Armstrong chose to live his post-spacefaring days as far from the limelight as possible.
Read more.
Monday, August 27, 2012
Tuesday, August 7, 2012
Curious Silence
The seven minutes of terror
were over. Mission Control at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory in
Pasadena finally had the news: Curiosity had landed as gently as a
feather on the surface of Mars, every step of the complex landing
process proceeding with unparalleled perfection. Even the weather conditions on the red planet were ideal for the landing. It was a spectacular accomplishment.
This was a huge victory for NASA and JPL, but much of the enthusiasm got lost in the much greater excitement over the Olympics and negativity of the multiple mass murders of recent weeks. A few weeks ago, a panorama of Mars exploded onto the internet, filling the public with awe over the alien yet strangely familiar landscape. President Obama’s lauding of the great accomplishment of this mission was not met with the rapt attention of the American public the way our great space explorations of the past were. The urge to explore is still out there – in all of us – but why is it that Curiosity’s landing was so overshadowed by everything else in the news?
Read more at The Inclusive.
This was a huge victory for NASA and JPL, but much of the enthusiasm got lost in the much greater excitement over the Olympics and negativity of the multiple mass murders of recent weeks. A few weeks ago, a panorama of Mars exploded onto the internet, filling the public with awe over the alien yet strangely familiar landscape. President Obama’s lauding of the great accomplishment of this mission was not met with the rapt attention of the American public the way our great space explorations of the past were. The urge to explore is still out there – in all of us – but why is it that Curiosity’s landing was so overshadowed by everything else in the news?
Read more at The Inclusive.
Friday, July 20, 2012
On the Goodness of Humanity
Sometimes this world is like a sucker punch to the
stomach. You can’t help but stand
there, immobile and gasping for breath at the sheer senselessness of it.
It has been hard lately to be optimistic. An old friend of
mine was just involved in a horrible car accident. Five years ago, another
close friend was in a coma when she was hit by a drag racer on the freeway. At least twelve people died last
night in a mindless shooting in Colorado.
And in the weeks prior to that, the internet was awash with stories of
rape, child molestation, and violence against and harassment of women. The world is bleeding deep, personal
pain, and history tells us this is nothing new. It seems that every time I
check my email, go online, or read a paper, something horrific has occurred. When
I walk outside, the number of suffering, hungry, and homeless in just my own neighborhood
is impossible to deny. Even for those of us fortunate to be healthy and have a
roof over our heads and food to eat at night, so many carry around deep
pain. The developed world has an
entire set of its own problems: eating disorders, cancer, obesity-related
illness, office anxiety. So many suffer in silence. The pain out there is fathomless. It’s palpable. It’s tangible.
A girl can only do so much, only be pulled so many
directions before it feels hopeless.
There are days that I don’t want to get out of bed. I want to pull the
covers up over my head and never speak to another human being again. Yes, this world can knock the wind out
of you.
But it can also take your breath away for other, more
beautiful reasons.
Photography: "Rustic"
"Rustic" - the inside of a lodge in a South African game reserve.
http://fineartamerica.com/featured/rustic-casey-berger.html
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


























